May 182012
 

Demand better of bands who glorify violence against women »

Kudos to +Jairus Khan of the industrial band Ad·ver·sary for taken a principled stand opposing the violence against women, sexism, racism and other stupid -isms glorified by widely-known bands (within the genre) with whom he shares the stage at Kinetik, the yearly weekend underground music festival held in Montreal, Canada.

The 'PSA' video backing his performance can be seen here: http://vimeo.com/42322595

We were contacted a few days before leaving for Kinetik by Jairus Khan from Ad·ver·sary. He told us that he was planning a visual presentation for his set at the festival which he anticipated would at…
May 172012
 

Scathing report on Toronto G20 police conduct »

Toronto police used excessive force to suppress lawful dissent at the G20 summit in June 2010, according to an independent civilian review.

“What occurred over the course of the weekend resulted in the largest mass arrests in Canadian history. These disturbances had a profound impact not only on the citizens of Toronto and Canada generally, but on public confidence in the police as well,” writes Gerry McNeilly, head of the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD), a citizen agency that today tabled the 300-page systemic review report. … The OIPRD concludes that many of the arrests of peaceful demonstrators were illegal — without proper warrants or reasonable grounds — and that the conditions and treatment of prisoners inside a makeshift detention centre were "improper and unnecessary". … "The common themes were allegations of unlawful searches, unlawful arrests, excessive use of force, improper detention and issues related to the prison’s processing centre," he said.http://goo.gl/GzK1s

This OPIRD report comes on the heels of the acquittal of notorious G20 hacktivist Byron Sonne on all (trumped up) charges for which he was held in jail for more than a year. [See http://goo.gl/cZXcL & http://goo.gl/9NQIz ]

Earlier this week, another independent review exonerated the actions of the RCMP at the G20. Foretelling the OPIRD report, it indicated that RCMP officers had been concerned about the severe tactics ordered by the Toronto police commanders. In particular, they cited the use of 'kettling', the controversial crowd-control tactic of coralling and containing protestors, in contravention of standing policies, and which was further abused for prolonged detention causing unnecessary suffering for hours in the pouring rain. [See http://goo.gl/DN231 & http://goo.gl/4NZtt ]

Having watched the reputation of the RCMP steadily decline over the years owing to scandals and the oppressive practices used at previous summits, I had expected to see that the G20 policing tactics had been directed by the feds. Instead, I find our local police have become severely autocratic and insensitive to the civil rights of our citizens.

Finally, in the OPIRD report: McNeilly concludes that the decision by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to expand the G8 meeting in Huntsville, Ont., to a full blown meeting of the G20 leaders in Toronto just four months before the event posed serious challenges.

Harper should accept the responsibility of his hubris for this fiasco. The G20 should never have been situated in downtown Toronto, let alone with such short time to prepare.

Poor planning by various levels of police, along with orders by a Toronto deputy police chief to take back the streets, are to blame for the more than 1,100 arrests during the 2010 summit, says the pr…
May 072012
 

Canada to outlaw masks worn by activists at 'tumultuous demonstrations' »

Bill C-309, first introduced before the House of Commons last year, would amend the Criminal Code of Canada and impose a five year prison sentence for anyone convicted of the offence and make such an act an indictable offence. A "tumultuous demonstration" could be defined as a "riot" or an "unlawful assembly". Activists may choose to wear masks at demonstrations for many reasons, including the wish to conceal their faces, for example, at an anti-police brutality rally in case they face retribution from the police or to protect their identity from police in general. Other reasons may include protecting oneself from the effects of chemical weapons such as tear gas or pepper spray. … This could mean wearing a mask at a demonstration in itself could put you in conflict with the police if the demonstration was, for example, declared illegal.

A new private Members Bill — Bill C-309 — will make it illegal for demonstrators to cover their faces during "tumultuous demonstrations," with a penalty of up to five years in prison. Bill…
Apr 242012
 

Undercover Anarchist »

What happens when a cop falls in love with the radicals he’s spying on? Mark Kennedy found out the hard way.

David Kushner’s piece published in ROLLING STONE (01 March 2012), about a British undercover cop who infiltrated radical environmental groups as the War on Eco-Terrorists was unfolding around the world, makes for a fascinating story of subterfuge, values, and betrayal.

Close. couch logo Enjoy this article by switching to Readability view » (What’s Readability?)
Mar 202012
 

Stop Using Orangutans as Prostitutes! »

WTF??? This is wrong on so many levels. ;-/

This is one of the most disturbing things we have come across. A Care2 member created this petition to end the horrific practice of selling orangutans to Indonesian brothels. Please, please SIGN and SHARE to bring international attention to these voiceless victims! — Care2 via Facebook

The unthinkable is being done to female orangutans in Indonesia. They are being captured and used in brothels as prostit (1747 signatures on petition)
Mar 152012
 

A Visualization of the KONY2012 Social Media Campaign »

The campaign by the nonprofit advocacy group Invisible Children centered around Joseph Kony, the Uganda warlord and leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, a guerrilla group with a long and violent history that includes the kidnapping of children. With striking and dramatic imagery and Hollywood-style editing, the campaign video presents an utterly compelling message in the age of “social” media: by simply clicking “share,” you can make a difference in the world. And “share” the world did, the video racking up 100 million views YouTube in only six days (the fastest campaign to surpass that high bar after Susan Boyle did it in 9, and Lady Gaga’s Bad Romance took 18 days).

This article presents some interesting data, network maps, trend charts and insight into the tactics for how this social activist campaign unfolded online.

If you've spent any time at all on Twitter and Facebook over the last week or so, you've undoubtably heard about KONY2012. The campaign by the nonprofit advocacy group Invisible Children cente…
Mar 102012
 

DEEP GREEN RESISTANCE: Do We Need a Militant Movement to Save the Planet (and Ourselves)? »

We are living in a period of mass extinction. What is your personal carrying capacity for grief, rage, despair? … Ninety–eight percent of the population will do nothing unless they are led, cajoled, or forced. If the structural determinants are in place for them to live their lives without doing damage—like if they’re hunter–gatherers with respected elders—then that’s what happens. If, on the other hand, the built environment has been arranged for cars, industrial schooling is mandatory, resisting war taxes will land you in jail, food is only available through giant corporate enterprises selling giant corporate degradation, and misogynist pornography is only a click away 24/7, well, welcome to the nightmare. This culture is basically conducting a huge Milgram experiment with us, only the electric shocks aren’t fake—they’re killing off the planet, species by species. … So what are our options? The usual approach of long, slow institutional change has been foreclosed, and many of us know that. … Industrialism itself is what has to stop. … So, will you think it—that one word: resistance?
— Derrick Jensen, Lierre Keith and Aric McBay, May 5, 2011 in an excerpt published at ClimateStoryTellers: http://goo.gl/Zh2Wz

AlterNet has an article on the book and interview with the authors here: http://goo.gl/jBFvw

They use words like "militant" and "resistance" a lot. And they critique the Left a lot. And they review the semantics of "violence." … And so how do we save the world (and along with it ourselves)? Well, naturally we take down industrial civilization, they say. Yeah, no small feat. Especially when so many of us actually live quite comfortably in this civilization. … But according to Jensen, Keith and McBay, it is necessary because no other response out there even comes close to matching the scale of the problem we face. And we can no longer afford to simply make personal changes to bike more and eat local. And we can no longer afford to be grieved by polluted rivers or angered by short-sighted politicians without doing everything we can to stop it. So what do we do? Their 500-plus page book attempts to map out a strategy for their vision and also provide a critique of historical resistance movements — what works, what doesn't work.

When I first read Derrick Jensen's Endgame I was initially struck with his immense passion for the environment but the more I read, the more difficult I found it to accept his approach towards achieving sustainabilty. Perhaps it was the imagery of sexual violence he uses to underscore his points. For him, this is more than just an metaphor and he is not subtle about it. Jensen is a survivor of abuse and sexual violence; the scars are visible throughout his work. Nor was it the call for resistance, even violent eco-terrorism, that put me off. There is no doubt that we are running out of time ecologically on this plant and arguably most progressive changes in human civilization have come about through violent revolution. No, what bothered me most was the pessimistic vision contained in the strategy of overthrowing all of civilization to be replaced by an anarcho-primitivist society eschewing modern technology and sustaining itself through permaculture alone. Yet, one way or another, that may be how the most successful survivors of our civilization will live. Resistance now may afford more agreeable alternatives.

Derrick Jensen, Lierre Keith and Aric McBay call for new strategy to stave off environmental catastrophe.
Mar 052012
 

It's Now a Crime To Film Animal Abuse In Iowa »

The state of Iowa has beoome the first state to make it a crime to film animal abuse with the intent to secretly videotape animal abuse by passing House File 589. Undercover [video] has been instrumental in exposing animal abuse in the past and has also been central to passing legislation to stop the horrific treatment of animals used for food, research, and entertainment, ours, not theirs. … Iowa is considered to have the weakest animal protection laws in the United states and it shouldn't come as a surprise that "Governor Terry Branstad signed the law in a private ceremony. Iowa is the country's leading producer of pork and eggs and the governor is known to have 'strong ties to the state's agricultural industry.'" This bill [not] only threatens animal well-being but also human health and civil liberties. Other states (Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, and Utah) are considering similar laws.

Shameful. But, of course, one should expect such hostility from the plutocracy towards animal rights activists who threaten the efficiency of their agribusinesses and, for some time, have been classified as domestic terrorists in the USA. ;-/

Filming animal abuse in a fraudulent manner is now a misdemeanor By Marc Bekoff, Ph.D….
Mar 042012
 

US Congress passes authoritarian anti-protest law »

A bill passed Monday in the US House of Representatives and Thursday in the Senate would make it a felony—a serious criminal offense punishable by lengthy terms of incarceration—to participate in many forms of protest associated with the Occupy Wall Street protests of last year. Several commentators have dubbed it the “anti-Occupy” law, but its implications are far broader. … The virtually unanimous passage of H.R. 347 starkly exposes the fact that, despite all the posturing, the Democrats and the Republicans stand shoulder to shoulder with the corporate and financial oligarchy, which regarded last year’s popular protests against social inequality with a mixture of fear and hostility. … What lies behind the unprecedented attack underway on the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is a growing understanding in the ruling class that the protests that took place around the world against social inequality in 2011 will inevitably re-emerge in more and more powerful forms in 2012 and beyond, as austerity measures and the crashing economy make the conditions of life more and more impossible for the working class.

A bill passed by Congress makes it a felony—a serious criminal offense punishable by lengthy terms of incarceration—to participate in many forms of protest.
Jun 252011
 

When I started this blog I stated that it was to be about world issues and not personal matters. Well, with this posting that’s about to change somewhat. Yet, there’s still not going to be any teen-girl drama. ;-)

I had intended to write a blog post last summer, after the G20 fiasco in Toronto. I was appalled at the heavy-handed conduct of the police and government authorities then and the lack of remorse, contrition or even serious introspection since. I was also quite disappointed in the acceptance of these actions by a large contingent of the population, reflecting a profound political disengagement and apathy that warrants a reminder of “First they came…” However, I just couldn’t find the words to express my outrage any better than many others who were echoing my sentiments.

The issues of the G8/G20 meetings being protested were sidelined by the policing issues, many details of which I won’t delve into here as they are well documented elsewhere. That is not to say the latter were not important; indeed, they are (especially, given the billion dollar price tag!) and there needs to be a serious inquiry into how this was allowed to happen as it did and why there has been so little done to assure it will not happen again. Unfortunately, the mainstream media dwells not on what is most important but rather (to them) what is most urgent, that is to say, they instead cover what’s sensational. Sadly, there is very little investigative journalism anymore.

For instance, the Harperialist agenda of the G8 meeting in Muskoka prominently featured the funding for maternal health initiatives in the developing world. Significant media attention was (justifiably) drawn to the fact that such funding did not include some family planning initiatives that were at odds with Conservative ideology. However, little attention was given to the larger smoke-and-mirrors issue that this funding announcement was nothing new; it was just the reaffirmation of previous commitments to fund United Nations Millennium Development Goal (MDG) initiatives. Yet, what was left unsaid (or at least under-reported) in the mainstream media is that many of the other previous MDG commitments were left unfulfilled by the G8 countries.

At the time of the G20, Toronto was in the midst of the pre-election mayoralty race and an already unbelievable amount of attention was being paid to a comic fringe candidate running on a Palinesque populist platform. In the fall, Toronto elected right-wing buffoon Rob Ford as mayor and he set about immediately to undo much of what good had been done by his predecessors. Not long thereafter, Canada re-elected the Harperialist federal government, only this time with a majority after years of wheedling an electorate that is largely disengaged, apathetic and disgusted with political maneuvering. We can expect the government to continue, now unhindered: kowtowing to the economic interests of industrial-age resource-based industries; attacking social programmes while ensuring tax breaks for the wealthy; avoiding, indeed deriding, scientific and fact-based policy development, especially anything to do with climate change; imposing more oppressive surveillance, policing and tough-on-crime sentencing, likely including a step-up of the widely repudiated War on Drugs; and enforcing even more draconian intellectual property laws than the United States. Coming in the fall of 2011, I fully expect Ontario will elect a Conservative government, having grown tired of the lackluster performance of the Liberals, whereupon more attacks will be visited upon social programmes and green initiatives will be curtailed, particularly in the energy sector. Oh, and south of the border the Republicans have assumed a majority in both the House and the Senate.

In the year prior, I had been seriously dismayed by the collapse of the climate change talks in Copenahagen, after which the green movement seemed to give up pursuing geo-political solutions, while climate denialism continued to flourish. Obama, who had been elected on the audacity of his platform of Hope was fighting an economic collapse and a rear-guard action against Republicans during the mid-term elections, did little to address any of these larger issues. Of course, he was reflecting the mood of the people, who were more concerned with their own immediate economic situation than the seemingly abstract issues of climate change, peak oil, etc.

So at about the time of the G20, I was undergoing some personal stress, a sort of existential crisis. I had become extraordinarily anxious about many of the global issues (about which I’ve previously blogged) that we confront as a civilization, indeed as a species, as the sustainability of our way of living becomes more untenable on a finite planet.  A sense of futility exacerbated my cynicism of the political process and I was beginning to succumb to a feeling of deep depression and despair. I think I’ve posted about how I had become disillusioned with my software development career, how I’d abandoned some of my early environmental ideals to pursue the manufacture of bits, which arguably did little except improve the efficiency of capitalist interests. (Of course, having to deal with entrepreneurial psychopaths didn’t help!) I felt a personal guilt for having been part of the Hippie generation that first embraced and celebrated environmentalism, then turned our backs on it as we grew up, took up careers, settled down to raise families in the suburbs and commute in SUVs. It has only been over the past few years I’ve re-awakened to many of these issues and I’m now dealing with the psychological fallout.

I can’t say it was the events or aftermath of the G20 per se, or my disillusionment about them, but it was about that time that I realized that I needed an awakening of a more profound kind to shake me from my neurosis. So, for the past year, I’ve been pursuing an inward journey of personal development along a more spiritual path. Oh, I’m still an avowed (agnostic) atheist, although I’m less militant about it, now. I’ve been reading about Advaita Vedanta (a non-dual form of Hinduism compatible with atheism) and Buddhism (which originally derived from many of the same concepts), although I’m still wrestling with how to reconcile their metaphysics with what I know and believe about the reality in which we live. This also led me back to reading more science, especially cosmology, psychology and philosophy. I’ve also taken up reading literature  — and not just my favourite existential authors (Camus, Dostoyevski, etc.)! — which is quite a departure from my strictly non-fiction diet. I think it’s working.

All in all, I’m fairly happy with life and have a more positive outlook than last year at this time. I’m back to work on a voluntary basis with a not-for-profit organization that is a clearinghouse for information on social justice and environmental issues. In the short-term, I’ll be leveraging my IT skills to upgrade their infrastructure and I hope to develop a new website or, at least, enhance what is already there. Afterwards, I hope to do more in the area of writing and editing of articles to be published online. Apart from joining a career networking meetup group recently, this is the first concrete step, after some considerable time not working, I’ve made towards rebuilding my career. I had thought of abandoning the IT field altogether but I’m reconsidering that now and think that I’ll keep it as an option going forward, at least in terms of seeking out transitional opportunities.

The journey continues…